Demographics details for Tullahoma, TN vs Drakesboro, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tullahoma, TN vs Drakesboro, KY.
Data | Tullahoma | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,830 | 474 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 42.7 years |
Median Income | $56,771 | $39,659 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Tullahoma vs Drakesboro
- In Tullahoma, the population is higher at 20,830, compared to 474 in Drakesboro.
- The median age in Drakesboro is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 40.2 years in Tullahoma.
- Tullahoma has a higher median income of $56,771 compared to $39,659 in Drakesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tullahoma at 41.0% compared to 28.0% in Drakesboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Drakesboro at 15%, compared to 10% in Tullahoma.
- Drakesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Tullahoma.
Demographics
Demographics Tullahoma vs Drakesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tullahoma | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 9 |
White | 83 | 83 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 6% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Tullahoma and Drakesboro at 83%.
- The Asian population is larger in Tullahoma at 2% compared to 0% in Drakesboro.
- Drakesboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Tullahoma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tullahoma at 4% compared to 1% in Drakesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tullahoma and Drakesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tullahoma | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 21.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 17.1% |
Depression | 28.9% | 29.5% |
Smoking | 22.6% | 27.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 39.1% | 43.3% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 19.9% in Tullahoma.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Drakesboro at 29.5% versus 28.9% in Tullahoma.
- Drakesboro has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 22.6% in Tullahoma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tullahoma at 15.1% compared to 13.8% in Drakesboro.
- Drakesboro has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 39.1% in Tullahoma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Drakesboro at 27.0% compared to 19.0% in Tullahoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tullahoma | Drakesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (117) | 1.7% (8) |
High School Diploma | 18.9% (3,932) | 28.7% (136) |
Less than High School | 14.1% (2,944) | 28.3% (134) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (4,012) | 0.8% (4) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tullahoma vs Drakesboro
- In Drakesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Tullahoma.
- In Drakesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 18.9% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Drakesboro at 28.3%, compared to 14.1% in Tullahoma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tullahoma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 0.8% in Drakesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.