Demographics details for Tullahoma, TN vs Bloomington, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Tullahoma, TN vs Bloomington, IN.

Data Tullahoma Bloomington
Population 20,830 79,107
Median Age 40.2 years 24.4 years
Median Income $56,771 $46,543
Married Families 41.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 6.2

Population Comparison: Tullahoma vs Bloomington

  • The population in Bloomington is higher at 79,107, compared to 20,830 in Tullahoma.
  • Residents in Tullahoma have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 24.4 years in Bloomington.
  • Tullahoma has a higher median income of $56,771 compared to $46,543 in Bloomington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Tullahoma at 41.0% compared to 23.0% in Bloomington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bloomington at 18%, compared to 10% in Tullahoma.
  • Bloomington has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.5% in Tullahoma.

Demographics

Demographics Tullahoma vs Bloomington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Tullahoma Bloomington
Black 6 5
White 83 75
Asian 2 11
Hispanic 5 4
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Bloomington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tullahoma at 6% compared to 5% in Bloomington.
  • Tullahoma has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 75% in Bloomington.
  • In Bloomington, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Tullahoma.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Tullahoma at 5% compared to 4% in Bloomington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bloomington at 5%, compared to 4% in Tullahoma.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tullahoma and Bloomington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Tullahoma Bloomington
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 11.7%
Depression 28.9% 26.7%
Smoking 22.6% 17.0%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 16.7%
Obesity 39.1% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Bloomington

  • More residents in Tullahoma report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.6% in Bloomington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Tullahoma at 28.9% compared to 26.7% in Bloomington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Tullahoma at 22.6% compared to 17.0% in Bloomington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bloomington at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Tullahoma.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Tullahoma at 39.1% compared to 34.4% in Bloomington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Tullahoma at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Bloomington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Tullahoma Bloomington
No Schooling 0.6% (117) 0.1% (95)
High School Diploma 18.9% (3,932) 5.8% (4,606)
Less than High School 14.1% (2,944) 4.2% (3,311)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.3% (4,012) 29.0% (22,911)

Education Levels Comparison: Tullahoma vs Bloomington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Tullahoma have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Bloomington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Tullahoma hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 5.8% in Bloomington.
  • More residents in Tullahoma have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 4.2% in Bloomington.
  • In Bloomington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.0% compared to 19.3% in Tullahoma.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.