Demographics details for Trumann, AR vs Parsons, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trumann, AR vs Parsons, KS.
| Data | Trumann | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,305 | 9,382 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $37,618 | $48,990 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Trumann vs Parsons
- The population in Parsons is higher at 9,382, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- Residents in Trumann have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 38.0 years in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher median income of $48,990, compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Trumann at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Parsons.
- Trumann has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Parsons.
- The unemployment rate in Trumann is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Parsons.
Demographics
Demographics Trumann vs Parsons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Trumann | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 8 |
| White | 84 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Trumann vs Parsons
- In Parsons, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 5% in Trumann.
- Trumann has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 79% in Parsons.
- Both Trumann and Parsons have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Parsons has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Trumann.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Trumann at 8% compared to 6% in Parsons.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Trumann and Parsons at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Trumann | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 25.0% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 44.6% | 45.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trumann vs Parsons
- More residents in Trumann report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.4% in Parsons.
- Depression is more prevalent in Trumann at 28.5% compared to 22.3% in Parsons.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Trumann at 25.0% compared to 22.4% in Parsons.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parsons at 17.3% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Parsons has higher obesity rates at 45.2% compared to 44.6% in Trumann.
- Disability percentages are higher in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 23.0% in Parsons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Trumann | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (135) | 1.2% (113) |
| High School Diploma | 25.9% (1,895) | 15.2% (1,423) |
| Less than High School | 24.4% (1,780) | 11.6% (1,093) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (487) | 17.3% (1,621) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trumann vs Parsons
- A higher percentage of residents in Trumann have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.2% in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trumann hold a high school diploma at 25.9% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
- More residents in Trumann have less than a high school education at 24.4% compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
- In Parsons, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.