Demographics details for Trumann, AR vs Greenville, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trumann, AR vs Greenville, MS.
| Data | Trumann | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,305 | 28,017 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $37,618 | $35,148 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Trumann vs Greenville
- The population in Greenville is higher at 28,017, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- Residents in Trumann have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 38.7 years in Greenville.
- Trumann has a higher median income of $37,618 compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Trumann at 35.0% compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 30%, compared to 13% in Trumann.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.2% in Trumann.
Demographics
Demographics Trumann vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Trumann | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 87 |
| White | 84 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Trumann vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 87% compared to 5% in Trumann.
- Trumann has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Trumann.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Trumann at 3% compared to 0% in Greenville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Trumann at 8% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Trumann and Greenville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Trumann | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 25.0% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 10.6% |
| Obesity | 44.6% | 46.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trumann vs Greenville
- More residents in Trumann report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 19.4% in Greenville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Trumann at 28.5% compared to 21.2% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 25.0% in Trumann.
- Binge drinking is more common in Trumann at 14.4% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 44.6% in Trumann.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 24.0% in Trumann.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Trumann | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (135) | 1.8% (501) |
| High School Diploma | 25.9% (1,895) | 20.2% (5,661) |
| Less than High School | 24.4% (1,780) | 15.5% (4,352) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (487) | 14.5% (4,052) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trumann vs Greenville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Trumann and Greenville at 1.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trumann hold a high school diploma at 25.9% compared to 20.2% in Greenville.
- More residents in Trumann have less than a high school education at 24.4% compared to 15.5% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.