Demographics details for Trumann, AR vs Danville, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trumann, AR vs Danville, KY.
Data | Trumann | Danville |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,305 | 17,303 |
Median Age | 40.0 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $37,618 | $48,038 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Trumann vs Danville
- The population in Danville is higher at 17,303, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- Residents in Trumann have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 36.4 years in Danville.
- Danville has a higher median income of $48,038, compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Trumann at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Danville.
- The poverty level is higher in Danville at 15%, compared to 13% in Trumann.
- The unemployment rate in Trumann is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Danville.
Demographics
Demographics Trumann vs Danville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Trumann | Danville |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 12 |
White | 84 | 79 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Trumann vs Danville
- In Danville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 5% in Trumann.
- Trumann has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 79% in Danville.
- In Danville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Trumann.
- Danville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Trumann.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Trumann at 8% compared to 4% in Danville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Trumann and Danville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Trumann | Danville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 14.1% |
Depression | 28.5% | 27.7% |
Smoking | 25.0% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 44.6% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trumann vs Danville
- More residents in Trumann report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 19.1% in Danville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Trumann at 28.5% compared to 27.7% in Danville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Trumann at 25.0% compared to 21.6% in Danville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Danville at 14.7% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Obesity rates are higher in Trumann at 44.6% compared to 41.5% in Danville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Danville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Trumann | Danville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (135) | 0.6% (108) |
High School Diploma | 25.9% (1,895) | 16.8% (2,899) |
Less than High School | 24.4% (1,780) | 12.1% (2,102) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (487) | 16.1% (2,789) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trumann vs Danville
- A higher percentage of residents in Trumann have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Danville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trumann hold a high school diploma at 25.9% compared to 16.8% in Danville.
- More residents in Trumann have less than a high school education at 24.4% compared to 12.1% in Danville.
- In Danville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.