Demographics details for Trumann, AR vs Big sandy, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trumann, AR vs Big sandy, TX.
Data | Trumann | Big sandy |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,305 | 1,286 |
Median Age | 40.0 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $37,618 | $41,250 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Trumann vs Big sandy
- In Trumann, the population is higher at 7,305, compared to 1,286 in Big sandy.
- Residents in Trumann have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 36.0 years in Big sandy.
- Big sandy has a higher median income of $41,250, compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- In Big sandy, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Trumann.
- The poverty level is identical in both Trumann and Big sandy at 13%.
- Big sandy has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Trumann.
Demographics
Demographics Trumann vs Big sandy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Trumann | Big sandy |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 14 |
White | 84 | 69 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Trumann vs Big sandy
- In Big sandy, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 5% in Trumann.
- Trumann has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 69% in Big sandy.
- Both Trumann and Big sandy have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Big sandy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Trumann.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Trumann at 8% compared to 5% in Big sandy.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Trumann and Big sandy at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Trumann | Big sandy |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 12.7% |
Depression | 28.5% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 25.0% | 19.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 44.6% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trumann vs Big sandy
- More residents in Trumann report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.9% in Big sandy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Trumann at 28.5% compared to 25.4% in Big sandy.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Trumann at 25.0% compared to 19.8% in Big sandy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Big sandy at 17.9% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Obesity rates are higher in Trumann at 44.6% compared to 35.9% in Big sandy.
- Disability percentages are higher in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Big sandy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Trumann | Big sandy |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (135) | 0.6% (8) |
High School Diploma | 25.9% (1,895) | 13.8% (178) |
Less than High School | 24.4% (1,780) | 23.4% (301) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (487) | 11.0% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trumann vs Big sandy
- A higher percentage of residents in Trumann have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Big sandy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trumann hold a high school diploma at 25.9% compared to 13.8% in Big sandy.
- More residents in Trumann have less than a high school education at 24.4% compared to 23.4% in Big sandy.
- In Big sandy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.