Demographics details for Troy, TX vs Lake havasu city, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Troy, TX vs Lake havasu city, AZ.
Data | Troy | Lake havasu city |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,727 | 58,926 |
Median Age | 29.7 years | 54.3 years |
Median Income | $64,694 | $64,027 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Troy vs Lake havasu city
- The population in Lake havasu city is higher at 58,926, compared to 2,727 in Troy.
- The median age in Lake havasu city is higher at 54.3 years, compared to 29.7 years in Troy.
- Troy has a higher median income of $64,694 compared to $64,027 in Lake havasu city.
- In Lake havasu city, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 37.0% in Troy.
- The poverty level is identical in both Troy and Lake havasu city at 11%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Troy and Lake havasu city at 4.1%.
Demographics
Demographics Troy vs Lake havasu city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Troy | Lake havasu city |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 57 | 75 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 29 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Troy vs Lake havasu city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Troy at 3% compared to 0% in Lake havasu city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake havasu city at 75% compared to 57% in Troy.
- In Lake havasu city, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Troy.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Troy at 29% compared to 15% in Lake havasu city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Troy at 11% compared to 8% in Lake havasu city.
- In Lake havasu city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Troy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Troy | Lake havasu city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.7% |
Depression | 24.1% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 16.3% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 33.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Troy vs Lake havasu city
- In Lake havasu city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in Troy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Troy at 24.1% compared to 20.6% in Lake havasu city.
- Lake havasu city has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 16.3% in Troy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake havasu city at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Troy.
- Obesity rates are higher in Troy at 36.1% compared to 33.6% in Lake havasu city.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Troy and Lake havasu city at 18.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Troy | Lake havasu city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (9) | 1.1% (664) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (367) | 20.8% (12,284) |
Less than High School | 9.6% (262) | 12.8% (7,543) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (279) | 14.2% (8,359) |
Education Levels Comparison: Troy vs Lake havasu city
- In Lake havasu city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Troy.
- In Lake havasu city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 13.5% in Troy.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lake havasu city at 12.8%, compared to 9.6% in Troy.
- In Lake havasu city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 10.2% in Troy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.