Demographics details for Troy, OH vs Crawfordsville, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Troy, OH vs Crawfordsville, IN.
| Data | Troy | Crawfordsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,679 | 16,479 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $69,730 | $46,918 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Troy vs Crawfordsville
- In Troy, the population is higher at 26,679, compared to 16,479 in Crawfordsville.
- Residents in Troy have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 36.7 years in Crawfordsville.
- Troy has a higher median income of $69,730 compared to $46,918 in Crawfordsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Troy at 41.0% compared to 32.0% in Crawfordsville.
- The poverty level is higher in Crawfordsville at 13%, compared to 10% in Troy.
- The unemployment rate in Troy is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Crawfordsville.
Demographics
Demographics Troy vs Crawfordsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Troy | Crawfordsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 83 | 84 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Troy vs Crawfordsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Troy at 3% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawfordsville at 84% compared to 83% in Troy.
- The Asian population is larger in Troy at 5% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
- Crawfordsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Troy.
- Both Troy and Crawfordsville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Troy and Crawfordsville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Troy | Crawfordsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Troy vs Crawfordsville
- In Crawfordsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.2% in Troy.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crawfordsville at 26.1% versus 22.5% in Troy.
- Crawfordsville has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 19.6% in Troy.
- Binge drinking is more common in Troy at 17.6% compared to 16.6% in Crawfordsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Troy at 39.9% compared to 37.0% in Crawfordsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawfordsville at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Troy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Troy | Crawfordsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (107) | 0.7% (114) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (5,006) | 23.1% (3,814) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (2,620) | 19.9% (3,274) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (5,490) | 10.4% (1,714) |
Education Levels Comparison: Troy vs Crawfordsville
- In Crawfordsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Troy.
- In Crawfordsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.1% compared to 18.8% in Troy.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawfordsville at 19.9%, compared to 9.8% in Troy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Troy hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 10.4% in Crawfordsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.