Demographics details for Trinity, TX vs Summerfield, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trinity, TX vs Summerfield, NC.
| Data | Trinity | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,996 | 11,111 |
| Median Age | 50.1 years | 45.1 years |
| Median Income | $51,165 | $148,182 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Trinity vs Summerfield
- In Trinity, the population is higher at 13,996, compared to 11,111 in Summerfield.
- Residents in Trinity have a higher median age of 50.1 years compared to 45.1 years in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182, compared to $51,165 in Trinity.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 44.0% in Trinity.
- Trinity has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- The unemployment rate in Trinity is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Trinity vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Trinity | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 5 |
| White | 76 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Trinity vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Trinity at 8% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 82% compared to 76% in Trinity.
- In Summerfield, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Trinity.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Trinity at 11% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Trinity at 5% compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Trinity and Summerfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Trinity | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 13.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 21.2% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 28.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trinity vs Summerfield
- More residents in Trinity report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Trinity at 26.4% compared to 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Trinity at 21.2% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 17.9% in Trinity.
- Obesity rates are higher in Trinity at 39.2% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Trinity at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Trinity | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (70) | 1.0% (109) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (3,102) | 8.8% (973) |
| Less than High School | 18.1% (2,540) | 6.1% (674) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,481) | 38.9% (4,326) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trinity vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Trinity.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trinity hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- More residents in Trinity have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 10.6% in Trinity.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.