Demographics details for Trinity, AL vs Sanger, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trinity, AL vs Sanger, CA.
| Data | Trinity | Sanger |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,547 | 26,600 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $94,706 | $69,333 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Trinity vs Sanger
- The population in Sanger is higher at 26,600, compared to 2,547 in Trinity.
- Residents in Trinity have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 31.8 years in Sanger.
- Trinity has a higher median income of $94,706 compared to $69,333 in Sanger.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Trinity at 44.0% compared to 34.0% in Sanger.
- The poverty level is higher in Sanger at 16%, compared to 10% in Trinity.
- Sanger has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 4.2% in Trinity.
Demographics
Demographics Trinity vs Sanger provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Trinity | Sanger |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 3 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 77 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
| American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Trinity vs Sanger
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Trinity at 9% compared to 0% in Sanger.
- Trinity has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 3% in Sanger.
- In Sanger, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Trinity.
- Sanger has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 77%, compared to 11% in Trinity.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanger at 15%, compared to 5% in Trinity.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Trinity and Sanger at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Trinity | Sanger |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trinity vs Sanger
- More residents in Trinity report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.5% in Sanger.
- Depression is more prevalent in Trinity at 24.7% compared to 17.2% in Sanger.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Trinity at 18.2% compared to 14.7% in Sanger.
- Binge drinking is more common in Trinity at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Sanger.
- Obesity rates are higher in Trinity at 41.0% compared to 40.2% in Sanger.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sanger at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Trinity.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Trinity | Sanger |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 2.9% (768) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (573) | 13.5% (3,599) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (96) | 32.2% (8,575) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (249) | 7.8% (2,067) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trinity vs Sanger
- In Sanger, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.2% in Trinity.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trinity hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 13.5% in Sanger.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sanger at 32.2%, compared to 3.8% in Trinity.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trinity hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 7.8% in Sanger.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.