Demographics details for Trinity, AL vs Hopkins, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trinity, AL vs Hopkins, SC.
| Data | Trinity | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,547 | 1,738 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $94,706 | $57,262 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Trinity vs Hopkins
- In Trinity, the population is higher at 2,547, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- The median age in Hopkins is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 38.1 years in Trinity.
- Trinity has a higher median income of $94,706 compared to $57,262 in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Trinity at 44.0% compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- Trinity has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The unemployment rate in Trinity is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Trinity vs Hopkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Trinity | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 83 |
| White | 73 | 16 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Trinity vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 9% in Trinity.
- Trinity has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- Both Trinity and Hopkins have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Trinity at 11% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Trinity at 5% compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Trinity at 2% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Trinity | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trinity vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.6% in Trinity.
- Depression is more prevalent in Trinity at 24.7% compared to 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 18.2% in Trinity.
- Binge drinking is more common in Trinity at 16.6% compared to 16.0% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 41.0% in Trinity.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 8.0% in Trinity.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Trinity | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 0.1% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (573) | 20.8% (362) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (96) | 11.3% (197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (249) | 16.2% (281) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trinity vs Hopkins
- A higher percentage of residents in Trinity have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trinity hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 20.8% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hopkins at 11.3%, compared to 3.8% in Trinity.
- In Hopkins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 9.8% in Trinity.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.