Demographics details for Trexlertown, PA vs Fairmont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trexlertown, PA vs Fairmont, NC.
| Data | Trexlertown | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,885 | 2,188 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 48.1 years |
| Median Income | $93,472 | $31,731 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Trexlertown vs Fairmont
- The population in Fairmont is higher at 2,188, compared to 1,885 in Trexlertown.
- The median age in Fairmont is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 34.6 years in Trexlertown.
- Trexlertown has a higher median income of $93,472 compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Trexlertown at 50.0% compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairmont at 22%, compared to 4% in Trexlertown.
- Fairmont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Trexlertown.
Demographics
Demographics Trexlertown vs Fairmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Trexlertown | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 62 |
| White | 65 | 14 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Trexlertown vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 18% in Trexlertown.
- Trexlertown has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- The Asian population is larger in Trexlertown at 11% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Trexlertown at 5% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- Both Trexlertown and Fairmont have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- In Fairmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 0% in Trexlertown.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Trexlertown | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 12.3% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 47.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 3.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trexlertown vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 13.5% in Trexlertown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairmont at 22.6% versus 19.9% in Trexlertown.
- Fairmont has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 12.3% in Trexlertown.
- Binge drinking is more common in Trexlertown at 19.4% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has higher obesity rates at 47.2% compared to 28.2% in Trexlertown.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 3.0% in Trexlertown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Trexlertown | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (347) | 27.5% (602) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (76) | 12.9% (282) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (776) | 14.4% (316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trexlertown vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Trexlertown.
- In Fairmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 18.4% in Trexlertown.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairmont at 12.9%, compared to 4.0% in Trexlertown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trexlertown hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 14.4% in Fairmont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.