Demographics details for Trexlertown, PA vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trexlertown, PA vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Trexlertown | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,885 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $93,472 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Trexlertown vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 1,885 in Trexlertown.
- Residents in Trexlertown have a higher median age of 34.6 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Trexlertown has a higher median income of $93,472 compared to $71,698 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Trexlertown at 50.0% compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 4% in Trexlertown.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Trexlertown.
Demographics
Demographics Trexlertown vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Trexlertown | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 22 |
| White | 65 | 59 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Trexlertown vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 18% in Trexlertown.
- Trexlertown has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Trexlertown at 11% compared to 1% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 5% in Trexlertown.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 1% in Trexlertown.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Trexlertown and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Trexlertown | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 12.3% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 3.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trexlertown vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 13.5% in Trexlertown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 19.9% in Trexlertown.
- Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 12.3% in Trexlertown.
- Binge drinking is more common in Trexlertown at 19.4% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 28.2% in Trexlertown.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 10.0% compared to 3.0% in Trexlertown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Trexlertown | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (347) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (76) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (776) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trexlertown vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Trexlertown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trexlertown hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 5.4%, compared to 4.0% in Trexlertown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trexlertown hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 18.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.