Demographics details for Trenton, NJ vs Fort smith, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trenton, NJ vs Fort smith, AR.
Data | Trenton | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
Population | 89,661 | 89,992 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $44,444 | $50,799 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 23% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.6 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Trenton vs Fort smith
- The population in Fort smith is higher at 89,992, compared to 89,661 in Trenton.
- The median age in Fort smith is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.8 years in Trenton.
- Fort smith has a higher median income of $50,799, compared to $44,444 in Trenton.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 24.0% in Trenton.
- Trenton has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 12% in Fort smith.
- The unemployment rate in Trenton is higher at 6.6%, compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.
Demographics
Demographics Trenton vs Fort smith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Trenton | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
Black | 46 | 8 |
White | 5 | 57 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 39 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Trenton vs Fort smith
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Trenton at 46% compared to 8% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort smith at 57% compared to 5% in Trenton.
- In Fort smith, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Trenton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Trenton at 39% compared to 19% in Fort smith.
- Both Trenton and Fort smith have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Trenton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Trenton | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 14.7% |
Depression | 20.3% | 27.8% |
Smoking | 23.8% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 13.2% |
Obesity | 34.1% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trenton vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.6% in Trenton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort smith at 27.8% versus 20.3% in Trenton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Trenton at 23.8% compared to 21.8% in Fort smith.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort smith at 13.2% compared to 12.8% in Trenton.
- Fort smith has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 34.1% in Trenton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Trenton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Trenton | Fort smith |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (2,659) | 2.3% (2,029) |
High School Diploma | 22.6% (20,286) | 14.8% (13,356) |
Less than High School | 26.6% (23,872) | 19.8% (17,822) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (9,327) | 16.4% (14,745) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trenton vs Fort smith
- A higher percentage of residents in Trenton have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.3% in Fort smith.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trenton hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
- More residents in Trenton have less than a high school education at 26.6% compared to 19.8% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 10.4% in Trenton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.