Demographics details for Towanda, PA vs Stuttgart, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Towanda, PA vs Stuttgart, AR.
| Data | Towanda | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,785 | 7,907 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $53,354 | $59,124 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Towanda vs Stuttgart
- The population in Stuttgart is higher at 7,907, compared to 2,785 in Towanda.
- Residents in Towanda have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 37.8 years in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher median income of $59,124, compared to $53,354 in Towanda.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Towanda and Stuttgart at 39.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Stuttgart at 18%, compared to 10% in Towanda.
- The unemployment rate in Towanda is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Stuttgart.
Demographics
Demographics Towanda vs Stuttgart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Towanda | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 42 |
| White | 94 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Towanda vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 3% in Towanda.
- Towanda has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- Both Towanda and Stuttgart have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Towanda and Stuttgart at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stuttgart at 3%, compared to 1% in Towanda.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Towanda and Stuttgart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Towanda | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Towanda vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.1% in Towanda.
- Depression is more prevalent in Towanda at 25.0% compared to 24.4% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 22.0% in Towanda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Towanda at 17.6% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Obesity rates are higher in Towanda at 42.2% compared to 39.7% in Stuttgart.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Towanda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Towanda | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (25) | 0.8% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (707) | 25.5% (2,015) |
| Less than High School | 23.7% (660) | 14.5% (1,144) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.5% (543) | 12.0% (948) |
Education Levels Comparison: Towanda vs Stuttgart
- A higher percentage of residents in Towanda have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Stuttgart.
- In Stuttgart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 25.4% in Towanda.
- More residents in Towanda have less than a high school education at 23.7% compared to 14.5% in Stuttgart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Towanda hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.