Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Water valley, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Water valley, MS.

Data Torrington Water valley
Population 35,563 3,361
Median Age 40.8 years 35.8 years
Median Income $66,616 $45,718
Married Families 35.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.8 4.3

Population Comparison: Torrington vs Water valley

  • In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • Residents in Torrington have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
  • Torrington has a higher median income of $66,616 compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Torrington at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
  • Torrington has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • Water valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.

Demographics

Demographics Torrington vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Torrington Water valley
Black 10 49
White 61 49
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 2
Two or More Races 9 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Water valley

  • In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 10% in Torrington.
  • Torrington has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 49% in Water valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Torrington at 3% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 2% in Water valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Torrington at 9% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Water valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Torrington Water valley
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 13.8%
Depression 23.3% 22.0%
Smoking 16.0% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 12.9%
Obesity 28.8% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Water valley

  • In Water valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Torrington at 23.3% compared to 22.0% in Water valley.
  • Water valley has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 16.0% in Torrington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Torrington at 16.6% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
  • Water valley has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Water valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Torrington Water valley
No Schooling 1.2% (425) 1.0% (34)
High School Diploma 22.6% (8,040) 24.0% (805)
Less than High School 16.1% (5,736) 13.0% (437)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.7% (6,279) 9.6% (322)

Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Water valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Water valley.
  • In Water valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 22.6% in Torrington.
  • More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.