Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Wappingers falls, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Wappingers falls, NY.

Data Torrington Wappingers falls
Population 35,563 6,064
Median Age 40.8 years 47.9 years
Median Income $66,616 $61,554
Married Families 35.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Torrington vs Wappingers falls

  • In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 6,064 in Wappingers falls.
  • The median age in Wappingers falls is higher at 47.9 years, compared to 40.8 years in Torrington.
  • Torrington has a higher median income of $66,616 compared to $61,554 in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Torrington at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Wappingers falls.
  • Torrington has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Wappingers falls.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.

Demographics

Demographics Torrington vs Wappingers falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Torrington Wappingers falls
Black 10 13
White 61 61
Asian 3 3
Hispanic 17 20
Two or More Races 9 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 10% in Torrington.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Torrington and Wappingers falls at 61%.
  • Both Torrington and Wappingers falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 17% in Torrington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Torrington at 9% compared to 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Wappingers falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Torrington Wappingers falls
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 11.9%
Depression 23.3% 22.8%
Smoking 16.0% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 16.4%
Obesity 28.8% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Torrington at 23.3% compared to 22.8% in Wappingers falls.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 16.0% in Torrington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Torrington at 16.6% compared to 16.4% in Wappingers falls.
  • Wappingers falls has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wappingers falls at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Torrington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Torrington Wappingers falls
No Schooling 1.2% (425) 0.9% (57)
High School Diploma 22.6% (8,040) 18.1% (1,099)
Less than High School 16.1% (5,736) 24.9% (1,511)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.7% (6,279) 14.2% (861)

Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Wappingers falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 18.1% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wappingers falls at 24.9%, compared to 16.1% in Torrington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 14.2% in Wappingers falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.