Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Sumrall, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Sumrall, MS.
| Data | Torrington | Sumrall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,563 | 1,911 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $66,616 | $82,292 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Torrington vs Sumrall
- In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 1,911 in Sumrall.
- Residents in Torrington have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 38.3 years in Sumrall.
- Sumrall has a higher median income of $82,292, compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
- In Sumrall, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
- The poverty level is higher in Sumrall at 10%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
- Sumrall has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Torrington vs Sumrall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Torrington | Sumrall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 22 |
| White | 61 | 73 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Sumrall
- In Sumrall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 10% in Torrington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sumrall at 73% compared to 61% in Torrington.
- The Asian population is larger in Torrington at 3% compared to 0% in Sumrall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 2% in Sumrall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Torrington at 9% compared to 3% in Sumrall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Sumrall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Torrington | Sumrall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Sumrall
- More residents in Torrington report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.5% in Sumrall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Torrington at 23.3% compared to 22.8% in Sumrall.
- Sumrall has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 16.0% in Torrington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Torrington at 16.6% compared to 15.9% in Sumrall.
- Sumrall has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sumrall at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Torrington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Torrington | Sumrall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (425) | 0.5% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (8,040) | 15.0% (286) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (5,736) | 3.5% (67) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,279) | 17.1% (326) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Sumrall
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Sumrall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 15.0% in Sumrall.
- More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 3.5% in Sumrall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 17.1% in Sumrall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.