Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Sherwood, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Sherwood, AR.
| Data | Torrington | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,563 | 33,082 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $66,616 | $74,917 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Torrington vs Sherwood
- In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 33,082 in Sherwood.
- Residents in Torrington have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 39.1 years in Sherwood.
- Sherwood has a higher median income of $74,917, compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
- In Sherwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Torrington and Sherwood at 9%.
- Sherwood has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Torrington vs Sherwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Torrington | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 28 |
| White | 61 | 64 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Sherwood
- In Sherwood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 10% in Torrington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sherwood at 64% compared to 61% in Torrington.
- The Asian population is larger in Torrington at 3% compared to 1% in Sherwood.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 3% in Sherwood.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Torrington at 9% compared to 4% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Sherwood at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Torrington | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Sherwood
- In Sherwood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sherwood at 23.9% versus 23.3% in Torrington.
- Sherwood has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Torrington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Torrington at 16.6% compared to 14.6% in Sherwood.
- Sherwood has higher obesity rates at 35.7% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sherwood at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Torrington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Torrington | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (425) | 0.6% (212) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (8,040) | 13.9% (4,592) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (5,736) | 6.9% (2,280) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,279) | 22.9% (7,568) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Sherwood
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 13.9% in Sherwood.
- More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 6.9% in Sherwood.
- In Sherwood, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 17.7% in Torrington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.