Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Sharon, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Sharon, MA.
| Data | Torrington | Sharon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,563 | 17,612 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $66,616 | $126,000 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Torrington vs Sharon
- In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 17,612 in Sharon.
- Residents in Torrington have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 40.5 years in Sharon.
- Sharon has a higher median income of $126,000, compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
- In Sharon, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
- Torrington has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 2% in Sharon.
- Sharon has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Torrington vs Sharon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Torrington | Sharon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1.9 |
| White | 61 | 88.2 |
| Asian | 3 | 5.3 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 3.5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2.0 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 0.1 |
Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Sharon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrington at 10% compared to 1.9% in Sharon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sharon at 88.2% compared to 61% in Torrington.
- In Sharon, the Asian population stands at 5.3%, greater than 3% in Torrington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 3.5% in Sharon.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Torrington at 9% compared to 2.0% in Sharon.
- In Sharon, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 0.1%, compared to 0% in Torrington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Torrington | Sharon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Sharon
- More residents in Torrington report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Torrington at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Torrington at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Torrington at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Torrington at 28.8% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Torrington | Sharon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (425) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (8,040) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (5,736) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,279) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Sharon
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.