Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Nampa, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Nampa, ID.
| Data | Torrington | Nampa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,563 | 110,951 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $66,616 | $67,346 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Torrington vs Nampa
- The population in Nampa is higher at 110,951, compared to 35,563 in Torrington.
- Residents in Torrington have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 33.5 years in Nampa.
- Nampa has a higher median income of $67,346, compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
- In Nampa, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
- The poverty level is higher in Nampa at 10%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
- Nampa has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Torrington vs Nampa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Torrington | Nampa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 65 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Nampa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrington at 10% compared to 1% in Nampa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Nampa at 65% compared to 61% in Torrington.
- The Asian population is larger in Torrington at 3% compared to 1% in Nampa.
- Nampa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 17% in Torrington.
- Both Torrington and Nampa have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- In Nampa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Torrington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Torrington | Nampa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Nampa
- In Nampa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Nampa at 24.0% versus 23.3% in Torrington.
- Nampa has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 16.0% in Torrington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Torrington at 16.6% compared to 15.2% in Nampa.
- Nampa has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Nampa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Torrington | Nampa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (425) | 0.9% (1,011) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (8,040) | 14.8% (16,423) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (5,736) | 14.3% (15,852) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,279) | 12.6% (13,951) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Nampa
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Nampa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 14.8% in Nampa.
- More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 14.3% in Nampa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 12.6% in Nampa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.