Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Mukilteo, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Mukilteo, WA.
| Data | Torrington | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,563 | 21,096 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $66,616 | $123,036 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Torrington vs Mukilteo
- In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 21,096 in Mukilteo.
- The median age in Mukilteo is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 40.8 years in Torrington.
- Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036, compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
- In Mukilteo, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
- Torrington has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Torrington vs Mukilteo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Torrington | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 61 |
| Asian | 3 | 21 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrington at 10% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Torrington and Mukilteo at 61%.
- In Mukilteo, the Asian population stands at 21%, greater than 3% in Torrington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 6% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mukilteo at 11%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Mukilteo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Torrington | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Mukilteo
- More residents in Torrington report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.6% in Mukilteo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mukilteo at 26.5% versus 23.3% in Torrington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Torrington at 16.0% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Torrington at 16.6% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has higher obesity rates at 29.2% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukilteo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Torrington | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (425) | 0.1% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (8,040) | 9.7% (2,042) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (5,736) | 2.0% (414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,279) | 38.3% (8,089) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- In Mukilteo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 17.7% in Torrington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.