Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Mount clemens, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Mount clemens, MI.

Data Torrington Mount clemens
Population 35,563 15,409
Median Age 40.8 years 40.2 years
Median Income $66,616 $55,154
Married Families 35.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Torrington vs Mount clemens

  • In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 15,409 in Mount clemens.
  • Residents in Torrington have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 40.2 years in Mount clemens.
  • Torrington has a higher median income of $66,616 compared to $55,154 in Mount clemens.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Torrington at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Mount clemens.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mount clemens at 12%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
  • Mount clemens has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.

Demographics

Demographics Torrington vs Mount clemens provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Torrington Mount clemens
Black 10 24
White 61 65
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 3
Two or More Races 9 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Mount clemens

  • In Mount clemens, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 10% in Torrington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount clemens at 65% compared to 61% in Torrington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Torrington at 3% compared to 0% in Mount clemens.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 3% in Mount clemens.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Torrington at 9% compared to 8% in Mount clemens.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Mount clemens at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Torrington Mount clemens
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 19.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 14.1%
Depression 23.3% 25.8%
Smoking 16.0% 25.2%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 16.9%
Obesity 28.8% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Mount clemens

  • In Mount clemens, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mount clemens at 25.8% versus 23.3% in Torrington.
  • Mount clemens has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 16.0% in Torrington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mount clemens at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Torrington.
  • Mount clemens has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Mount clemens.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Torrington Mount clemens
No Schooling 1.2% (425) 1.4% (222)
High School Diploma 22.6% (8,040) 22.3% (3,437)
Less than High School 16.1% (5,736) 16.6% (2,554)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.7% (6,279) 12.1% (1,867)

Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Mount clemens

  • In Mount clemens, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Torrington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 22.3% in Mount clemens.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mount clemens at 16.6%, compared to 16.1% in Torrington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 12.1% in Mount clemens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.