Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Interlachen, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Interlachen, FL.

Data Torrington Interlachen
Population 35,563 1,457
Median Age 40.8 years 48.6 years
Median Income $66,616 $50,776
Married Families 35.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 4.5

Population Comparison: Torrington vs Interlachen

  • In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 1,457 in Interlachen.
  • The median age in Interlachen is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 40.8 years in Torrington.
  • Torrington has a higher median income of $66,616 compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
  • In Interlachen, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Interlachen at 12%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
  • Interlachen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.

Demographics

Demographics Torrington vs Interlachen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Torrington Interlachen
Black 10 11
White 61 37
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 34
Two or More Races 9 18
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Interlachen

  • In Interlachen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 10% in Torrington.
  • Torrington has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 37% in Interlachen.
  • The Asian population is larger in Torrington at 3% compared to 0% in Interlachen.
  • Interlachen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 17% in Torrington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Interlachen at 18%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Interlachen at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Torrington Interlachen
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 13.9%
Depression 23.3% 20.3%
Smoking 16.0% 24.5%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 16.7%
Obesity 28.8% 35.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Interlachen

  • In Interlachen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Torrington at 23.3% compared to 20.3% in Interlachen.
  • Interlachen has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 16.0% in Torrington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Interlachen at 16.7% compared to 16.6% in Torrington.
  • Interlachen has higher obesity rates at 35.5% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Interlachen at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Torrington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Torrington Interlachen
No Schooling 1.2% (425) 2.0% (29)
High School Diploma 22.6% (8,040) 22.0% (320)
Less than High School 16.1% (5,736) 41.7% (607)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.7% (6,279) 10.4% (151)

Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Interlachen

  • In Interlachen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.2% in Torrington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 22.0% in Interlachen.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Interlachen at 41.7%, compared to 16.1% in Torrington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 10.4% in Interlachen.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.