Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Highland park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Highland park, IL.

Data Torrington Highland park
Population 35,563 30,163
Median Age 40.8 years 48.0 years
Median Income $66,616 $159,567
Married Families 35.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level 9% 4%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 4.9

Population Comparison: Torrington vs Highland park

  • In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 30,163 in Highland park.
  • The median age in Highland park is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 40.8 years in Torrington.
  • Highland park has a higher median income of $159,567, compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
  • In Highland park, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
  • Torrington has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 4% in Highland park.
  • Highland park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.

Demographics

Demographics Torrington vs Highland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Torrington Highland park
Black 10 1
White 61 80
Asian 3 3
Hispanic 17 10
Two or More Races 9 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Highland park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrington at 10% compared to 1% in Highland park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Highland park at 80% compared to 61% in Torrington.
  • Both Torrington and Highland park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 10% in Highland park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Torrington at 9% compared to 6% in Highland park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Highland park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Torrington Highland park
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 12.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 6.9%
Depression 23.3% 17.5%
Smoking 16.0% 8.2%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 19.3%
Obesity 28.8% 27.9%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Highland park

  • More residents in Torrington report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 12.0% in Highland park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Torrington at 23.3% compared to 17.5% in Highland park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Torrington at 16.0% compared to 8.2% in Highland park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Highland park at 19.3% compared to 16.6% in Torrington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Torrington at 28.8% compared to 27.9% in Highland park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Highland park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Torrington Highland park
No Schooling 1.2% (425) 0.2% (67)
High School Diploma 22.6% (8,040) 4.7% (1,407)
Less than High School 16.1% (5,736) 3.3% (982)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.7% (6,279) 54.9% (16,564)

Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Highland park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Highland park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 4.7% in Highland park.
  • More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 3.3% in Highland park.
  • In Highland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.9% compared to 17.7% in Torrington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.