Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Chanhassen, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Chanhassen, MN.
| Data | Torrington | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,563 | 26,224 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $66,616 | $131,633 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Torrington vs Chanhassen
- In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 26,224 in Chanhassen.
- Residents in Torrington have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 40.6 years in Chanhassen.
- Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633, compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
- In Chanhassen, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
- Torrington has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 4% in Chanhassen.
- Chanhassen has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Torrington vs Chanhassen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Torrington | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 84 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Chanhassen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrington at 10% compared to 1% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chanhassen at 84% compared to 61% in Torrington.
- In Chanhassen, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Torrington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 3% in Chanhassen.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Torrington at 9% compared to 5% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Chanhassen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Torrington | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 11.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 6.4% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 29.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Chanhassen
- More residents in Torrington report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Torrington at 23.3% compared to 19.8% in Chanhassen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Torrington at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 16.6% in Torrington.
- Chanhassen has higher obesity rates at 29.7% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Torrington | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (425) | 0.1% (31) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (8,040) | 5.7% (1,502) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (5,736) | 1.7% (452) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,279) | 42.7% (11,186) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Chanhassen
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Chanhassen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 5.7% in Chanhassen.
- More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
- In Chanhassen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 17.7% in Torrington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.