Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Burnham, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Burnham, PA.
Data | Torrington | Burnham |
---|---|---|
Population | 35,563 | 1,972 |
Median Age | 40.8 years | 41.1 years |
Median Income | $66,616 | $58,929 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Torrington vs Burnham
- In Torrington, the population is higher at 35,563, compared to 1,972 in Burnham.
- The median age in Burnham is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 40.8 years in Torrington.
- Torrington has a higher median income of $66,616 compared to $58,929 in Burnham.
- In Burnham, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
- The poverty level is higher in Burnham at 14%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
- Burnham has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Torrington vs Burnham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Torrington | Burnham |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 3 |
White | 61 | 94 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 17 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Burnham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrington at 10% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burnham at 94% compared to 61% in Torrington.
- The Asian population is larger in Torrington at 3% compared to 0% in Burnham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 0% in Burnham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Torrington at 9% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Torrington and Burnham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Torrington | Burnham |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.6% |
Depression | 23.3% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 16.0% | 22.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 28.8% | 35.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Burnham
- In Burnham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burnham at 24.6% versus 23.3% in Torrington.
- Burnham has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 16.0% in Torrington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burnham at 18.3% compared to 16.6% in Torrington.
- Burnham has higher obesity rates at 35.5% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Burnham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Torrington | Burnham |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (425) | 0.3% (5) |
High School Diploma | 22.6% (8,040) | 27.1% (535) |
Less than High School | 16.1% (5,736) | 4.1% (80) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,279) | 7.5% (147) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Burnham
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Burnham.
- In Burnham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 22.6% in Torrington.
- More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 4.1% in Burnham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 7.5% in Burnham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.