Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Bartlesville, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Bartlesville, OK.

Data Torrington Bartlesville
Population 35,563 37,795
Median Age 40.8 years 37.5 years
Median Income $66,616 $58,230
Married Families 35.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.9

Population Comparison: Torrington vs Bartlesville

  • The population in Bartlesville is higher at 37,795, compared to 35,563 in Torrington.
  • Residents in Torrington have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 37.5 years in Bartlesville.
  • Torrington has a higher median income of $66,616 compared to $58,230 in Bartlesville.
  • In Bartlesville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bartlesville at 12%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
  • Bartlesville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.

Demographics

Demographics Torrington vs Bartlesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Torrington Bartlesville
Black 10 4
White 61 70
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 17 7
Two or More Races 9 9
American Indian Data is updating 8

Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Bartlesville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrington at 10% compared to 4% in Bartlesville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Bartlesville at 70% compared to 61% in Torrington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Torrington at 3% compared to 2% in Bartlesville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Torrington at 17% compared to 7% in Bartlesville.
  • Both Torrington and Bartlesville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
  • In Bartlesville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 8%, compared to 0% in Torrington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Torrington Bartlesville
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 12.1%
Depression 23.3% 24.9%
Smoking 16.0% 19.2%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 14.2%
Obesity 28.8% 41.3%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Bartlesville

  • In Bartlesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bartlesville at 24.9% versus 23.3% in Torrington.
  • Bartlesville has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 16.0% in Torrington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Torrington at 16.6% compared to 14.2% in Bartlesville.
  • Bartlesville has higher obesity rates at 41.3% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bartlesville at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Torrington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Torrington Bartlesville
No Schooling 1.2% (425) 0.7% (275)
High School Diploma 22.6% (8,040) 16.6% (6,277)
Less than High School 16.1% (5,736) 9.5% (3,604)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.7% (6,279) 22.2% (8,399)

Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Bartlesville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Bartlesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 16.6% in Bartlesville.
  • More residents in Torrington have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 9.5% in Bartlesville.
  • In Bartlesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 17.7% in Torrington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.