Demographics details for Torrington, CT vs Azusa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrington, CT vs Azusa, CA.
| Data | Torrington | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,563 | 48,824 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 32.8 years |
| Median Income | $66,616 | $81,516 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Torrington vs Azusa
- The population in Azusa is higher at 48,824, compared to 35,563 in Torrington.
- Residents in Torrington have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 32.8 years in Azusa.
- Azusa has a higher median income of $81,516, compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Torrington at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Azusa.
- The poverty level is higher in Azusa at 12%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
- Azusa has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Torrington vs Azusa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Torrington | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 3 |
| White | 61 | -6 |
| Asian | 3 | 16 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 66 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Torrington vs Azusa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrington at 10% compared to 3% in Azusa.
- Torrington has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to -6% in Azusa.
- In Azusa, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 3% in Torrington.
- Azusa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 17% in Torrington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Azusa at 20%, compared to 9% in Torrington.
- In Azusa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Torrington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Torrington | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 30.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrington vs Azusa
- More residents in Torrington report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.6% in Azusa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Torrington at 23.3% compared to 15.9% in Azusa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Torrington at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Azusa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Torrington at 16.6% compared to 15.1% in Azusa.
- Azusa has higher obesity rates at 30.3% compared to 28.8% in Torrington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Azusa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Torrington | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (425) | 2.5% (1,200) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (8,040) | 14.2% (6,920) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (5,736) | 25.2% (12,281) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (6,279) | 17.2% (8,417) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrington vs Azusa
- In Azusa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.2% in Torrington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 14.2% in Azusa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Azusa at 25.2%, compared to 16.1% in Torrington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 17.2% in Azusa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.