Demographics details for Torrance, CA vs Scottsbluff, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrance, CA vs Scottsbluff, NE.
Data | Torrance | Scottsbluff |
---|---|---|
Population | 141,126 | 14,283 |
Median Age | 42.9 years | 35.6 years |
Median Income | $109,554 | $55,744 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Torrance vs Scottsbluff
- In Torrance, the population is higher at 141,126, compared to 14,283 in Scottsbluff.
- Residents in Torrance have a higher median age of 42.9 years compared to 35.6 years in Scottsbluff.
- Torrance has a higher median income of $109,554 compared to $55,744 in Scottsbluff.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Torrance at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Scottsbluff.
- The poverty level is higher in Scottsbluff at 11%, compared to 8% in Torrance.
- The unemployment rate in Torrance is higher at 4.9%, compared to 2.6% in Scottsbluff.
Demographics
Demographics Torrance vs Scottsbluff provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Torrance | Scottsbluff |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 25 | 52 |
Asian | 39 | 1 |
Hispanic | 20 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Torrance vs Scottsbluff
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrance at 3% compared to 1% in Scottsbluff.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Scottsbluff at 52% compared to 25% in Torrance.
- The Asian population is larger in Torrance at 39% compared to 1% in Scottsbluff.
- Scottsbluff has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 20% in Torrance.
- Both Torrance and Scottsbluff have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 12%.
- In Scottsbluff, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Torrance.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Torrance | Scottsbluff |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 11.9% |
Depression | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Smoking | 7.9% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 21.4% | 42.3% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrance vs Scottsbluff
- In Scottsbluff, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 12.7% in Torrance.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Scottsbluff at 18.0% versus 14.0% in Torrance.
- Scottsbluff has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 7.9% in Torrance.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Scottsbluff at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Torrance.
- Scottsbluff has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 21.4% in Torrance.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scottsbluff at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Torrance.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Torrance | Scottsbluff |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (1,535) | 1.1% (156) |
High School Diploma | 11.4% (16,056) | 14.4% (2,056) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (8,337) | 14.7% (2,100) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.6% (55,843) | 18.1% (2,588) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrance vs Scottsbluff
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Torrance and Scottsbluff at 1.1%.
- In Scottsbluff, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 11.4% in Torrance.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Scottsbluff at 14.7%, compared to 5.9% in Torrance.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrance hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 18.1% in Scottsbluff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.