Demographics details for Torrance, CA vs Rockville centre, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Torrance, CA vs Rockville centre, NY.

Data Torrance Rockville centre
Population 141,126 25,662
Median Age 42.9 years 43.6 years
Median Income $109,554 $147,361
Married Families 45.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 3.1

Population Comparison: Torrance vs Rockville centre

  • In Torrance, the population is higher at 141,126, compared to 25,662 in Rockville centre.
  • The median age in Rockville centre is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 42.9 years in Torrance.
  • Rockville centre has a higher median income of $147,361, compared to $109,554 in Torrance.
  • In Rockville centre, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 45.0% in Torrance.
  • Torrance has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Rockville centre.
  • The unemployment rate in Torrance is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.1% in Rockville centre.

Demographics

Demographics Torrance vs Rockville centre provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Torrance Rockville centre
Black 3 4
White 25 77
Asian 39 6
Hispanic 20 9
Two or More Races 12 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Torrance vs Rockville centre

  • In Rockville centre, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Torrance.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockville centre at 77% compared to 25% in Torrance.
  • The Asian population is larger in Torrance at 39% compared to 6% in Rockville centre.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Torrance at 20% compared to 9% in Rockville centre.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Torrance at 12% compared to 4% in Rockville centre.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Torrance at 1% compared to 0% in Rockville centre.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Torrance Rockville centre
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 12.8%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 7.5%
Depression 14.0% 16.9%
Smoking 7.9% 9.7%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 18.5%
Obesity 21.4% 26.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Torrance vs Rockville centre

  • In Rockville centre, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 12.8% compared to 12.7% in Torrance.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Rockville centre at 16.9% versus 14.0% in Torrance.
  • Rockville centre has a higher smoking rate at 9.7% compared to 7.9% in Torrance.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockville centre at 18.5% compared to 15.0% in Torrance.
  • Rockville centre has higher obesity rates at 26.0% compared to 21.4% in Torrance.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockville centre at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Torrance.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Torrance Rockville centre
No Schooling 1.1% (1,535) 0.8% (200)
High School Diploma 11.4% (16,056) 9.4% (2,406)
Less than High School 5.9% (8,337) 6.2% (1,582)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.6% (55,843) 44.6% (11,456)

Education Levels Comparison: Torrance vs Rockville centre

  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrance have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Rockville centre.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Torrance hold a high school diploma at 11.4% compared to 9.4% in Rockville centre.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockville centre at 6.2%, compared to 5.9% in Torrance.
  • In Rockville centre, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 39.6% in Torrance.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.