Demographics details for Torrance, CA vs Gallitzin, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Torrance, CA vs Gallitzin, PA.
| Data | Torrance | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 141,126 | 1,508 |
| Median Age | 42.9 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $109,554 | $52,500 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Torrance vs Gallitzin
- In Torrance, the population is higher at 141,126, compared to 1,508 in Gallitzin.
- Residents in Torrance have a higher median age of 42.9 years compared to 39.4 years in Gallitzin.
- Torrance has a higher median income of $109,554 compared to $52,500 in Gallitzin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Torrance at 45.0% compared to 32.0% in Gallitzin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallitzin at 12%, compared to 8% in Torrance.
- Gallitzin has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.9% in Torrance.
Demographics
Demographics Torrance vs Gallitzin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Torrance | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 25 | 93 |
| Asian | 39 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Torrance vs Gallitzin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Torrance at 3% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallitzin at 93% compared to 25% in Torrance.
- The Asian population is larger in Torrance at 39% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Torrance at 20% compared to 3% in Gallitzin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Torrance at 12% compared to 4% in Gallitzin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Torrance at 1% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Torrance | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 14.0% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 7.9% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 21.4% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Torrance vs Gallitzin
- In Gallitzin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 12.7% in Torrance.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallitzin at 25.2% versus 14.0% in Torrance.
- Gallitzin has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 7.9% in Torrance.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gallitzin at 18.5% compared to 15.0% in Torrance.
- Gallitzin has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 21.4% in Torrance.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallitzin at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Torrance.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Torrance | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (1,535) | 1.1% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (16,056) | 29.8% (449) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (8,337) | 20.6% (310) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.6% (55,843) | 9.9% (150) |
Education Levels Comparison: Torrance vs Gallitzin
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Torrance and Gallitzin at 1.1%.
- In Gallitzin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.8% compared to 11.4% in Torrance.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallitzin at 20.6%, compared to 5.9% in Torrance.
- A higher percentage of residents in Torrance hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 9.9% in Gallitzin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.