Demographics details for Topeka, KS vs South windsor, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Topeka, KS vs South windsor, CT.
Data | Topeka | South windsor |
---|---|---|
Population | 125,449 | 26,054 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $54,052 | $90,964 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 62.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Topeka vs South windsor
- In Topeka, the population is higher at 125,449, compared to 26,054 in South windsor.
- The median age in South windsor is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.9 years in Topeka.
- South windsor has a higher median income of $90,964, compared to $54,052 in Topeka.
- In South windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 34.0% in Topeka.
- Topeka has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in South windsor.
- The unemployment rate in Topeka is higher at 3.7%, compared to 2.2% in South windsor.
Demographics
Demographics Topeka vs South windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Topeka | South windsor |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 9 |
White | 62 | 85 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 16 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Topeka vs South windsor
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Topeka at 10% compared to 9% in South windsor.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South windsor at 85% compared to 62% in Topeka.
- In South windsor, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Topeka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Topeka at 16% compared to 3% in South windsor.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Topeka at 9% compared to 2% in South windsor.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Topeka at 1% compared to 0% in South windsor.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Topeka | South windsor |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.5% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 20.8% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 41.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Topeka vs South windsor
- More residents in Topeka report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Depression is more prevalent in Topeka at 25.5% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Topeka at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Binge drinking is more common in Topeka at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Obesity rates are higher in Topeka at 41.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Topeka at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Topeka | South windsor |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (1,326) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (21,594) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 10.9% (13,657) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (24,214) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Topeka vs South windsor
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- More residents in Topeka have less than a high school education at 10.9% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.