Demographics details for Topeka, KS vs Hollister, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Topeka, KS vs Hollister, NC.
| Data | Topeka | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 125,449 | 847 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $54,052 | $39,913 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Topeka vs Hollister
- In Topeka, the population is higher at 125,449, compared to 847 in Hollister.
- Residents in Topeka have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 34.3 years in Hollister.
- Topeka has a higher median income of $54,052 compared to $39,913 in Hollister.
- In Hollister, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 34.0% in Topeka.
- The poverty level is higher in Hollister at 20%, compared to 14% in Topeka.
- Hollister has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.7% in Topeka.
Demographics
Demographics Topeka vs Hollister provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Topeka | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 16 |
| White | 62 | 21 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 41 |
Demographics Comparison: Topeka vs Hollister
- In Hollister, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 10% in Topeka.
- Topeka has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 21% in Hollister.
- In Hollister, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Topeka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Topeka at 16% compared to 4% in Hollister.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hollister at 13%, compared to 9% in Topeka.
- In Hollister, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 41%, compared to 1% in Topeka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Topeka | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 21.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 18.1% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 31.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Topeka vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 18.3% in Topeka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Topeka at 25.5% compared to 24.6% in Hollister.
- Hollister has a higher smoking rate at 31.3% compared to 20.8% in Topeka.
- Binge drinking is more common in Topeka at 16.9% compared to 14.9% in Hollister.
- Hollister has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 41.0% in Topeka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hollister at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Topeka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Topeka | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (1,326) | 3.9% (33) |
| High School Diploma | 17.2% (21,594) | 21.0% (178) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (13,657) | 12.3% (104) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (24,214) | 10.7% (91) |
Education Levels Comparison: Topeka vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 1.1% in Topeka.
- In Hollister, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 17.2% in Topeka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hollister at 12.3%, compared to 10.9% in Topeka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 10.7% in Hollister.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.