Demographics details for Topeka, KS vs Farmington, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Topeka, KS vs Farmington, CT.
Data | Topeka | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Population | 125,449 | 25,340 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $54,052 | $101,000 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 65.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 3% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Topeka vs Farmington
- In Topeka, the population is higher at 125,449, compared to 25,340 in Farmington.
- The median age in Farmington is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.9 years in Topeka.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $101,000, compared to $54,052 in Topeka.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 34.0% in Topeka.
- Topeka has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Topeka is higher at 3.7%, compared to 2.0% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Topeka vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Topeka | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 5 |
White | 62 | 85 |
Asian | 2 | 5 |
Hispanic | 16 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Topeka vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Topeka at 10% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 85% compared to 62% in Topeka.
- In Farmington, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Topeka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Topeka at 16% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Topeka at 9% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Topeka at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Topeka | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.5% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 20.8% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 41.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Topeka vs Farmington
- More residents in Topeka report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Topeka at 25.5% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Topeka at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Topeka at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Topeka at 41.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Topeka at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Topeka | Farmington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (1,326) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (21,594) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 10.9% (13,657) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (24,214) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Topeka vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- More residents in Topeka have less than a high school education at 10.9% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.