Demographics details for Topeka, KS vs Coleman, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Topeka, KS vs Coleman, OK.
| Data | Topeka | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 125,449 | 297 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $54,052 | $45,938 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Topeka vs Coleman
- In Topeka, the population is higher at 125,449, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- The median age in Coleman is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 37.9 years in Topeka.
- Topeka has a higher median income of $54,052 compared to $45,938 in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Topeka.
- Topeka has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Coleman.
- The unemployment rate in Topeka is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Coleman.
Demographics
Demographics Topeka vs Coleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Topeka | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 2 |
| White | 62 | 77 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Topeka vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Topeka at 10% compared to 2% in Coleman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Coleman at 77% compared to 62% in Topeka.
- The Asian population is larger in Topeka at 2% compared to 0% in Coleman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Topeka at 16% compared to 1% in Coleman.
- Both Topeka and Coleman have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- In Coleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 1% in Topeka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Topeka | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Topeka vs Coleman
- In Coleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.3% in Topeka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coleman at 26.9% versus 25.5% in Topeka.
- Coleman has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 20.8% in Topeka.
- Binge drinking is more common in Topeka at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Topeka at 41.0% compared to 40.8% in Coleman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 15.0% in Topeka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Topeka | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (1,326) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.2% (21,594) | 28.6% (85) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (13,657) | 4.0% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (24,214) | 11.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Topeka vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 17.2% in Topeka.
- More residents in Topeka have less than a high school education at 10.9% compared to 4.0% in Coleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 11.1% in Coleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.