Demographics details for Topeka, KS vs Cincinnati, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Topeka, KS vs Cincinnati, OH.
| Data | Topeka | Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 125,449 | 309,513 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 32.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,052 | $49,191 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Topeka vs Cincinnati
- The population in Cincinnati is higher at 309,513, compared to 125,449 in Topeka.
- Residents in Topeka have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 32.9 years in Cincinnati.
- Topeka has a higher median income of $54,052 compared to $49,191 in Cincinnati.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Topeka at 34.0% compared to 24.0% in Cincinnati.
- The poverty level is higher in Cincinnati at 17%, compared to 14% in Topeka.
- Cincinnati has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.7% in Topeka.
Demographics
Demographics Topeka vs Cincinnati provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Topeka | Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 40 |
| White | 62 | 46 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Topeka vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 10% in Topeka.
- Topeka has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 46% in Cincinnati.
- In Cincinnati, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Topeka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Topeka at 16% compared to 5% in Cincinnati.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Topeka at 9% compared to 6% in Cincinnati.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Topeka at 1% compared to 0% in Cincinnati.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Topeka | Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Topeka vs Cincinnati
- More residents in Topeka report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.0% in Cincinnati.
- Depression is more prevalent in Topeka at 25.5% compared to 21.6% in Cincinnati.
- Cincinnati has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 20.8% in Topeka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cincinnati at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in Topeka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Topeka at 41.0% compared to 39.8% in Cincinnati.
- Disability percentages are higher in Topeka at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Cincinnati.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Topeka | Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (1,326) | 0.9% (2,632) |
| High School Diploma | 17.2% (21,594) | 12.5% (38,643) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (13,657) | 9.6% (29,753) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (24,214) | 26.4% (81,592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Topeka vs Cincinnati
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Cincinnati.
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 12.5% in Cincinnati.
- More residents in Topeka have less than a high school education at 10.9% compared to 9.6% in Cincinnati.
- In Cincinnati, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 19.3% in Topeka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.