Demographics details for Topeka, KS vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Topeka, KS vs Central city, KY.
| Data | Topeka | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 125,449 | 5,810 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $54,052 | $52,184 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Topeka vs Central city
- In Topeka, the population is higher at 125,449, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- Residents in Topeka have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Topeka has a higher median income of $54,052 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Topeka.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 14% in Topeka.
- The unemployment rate in Topeka is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Topeka vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Topeka | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 3 |
| White | 62 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Topeka vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Topeka at 10% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 62% in Topeka.
- The Asian population is larger in Topeka at 2% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Topeka at 16% compared to 2% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Topeka at 9% compared to 6% in Central city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Topeka and Central city at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Topeka | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Topeka vs Central city
- In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.3% in Topeka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 25.5% in Topeka.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 20.8% in Topeka.
- Binge drinking is more common in Topeka at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 41.0% in Topeka.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Topeka and Central city at 15.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Topeka | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (1,326) | 1.1% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 17.2% (21,594) | 15.4% (897) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (13,657) | 15.6% (905) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (24,214) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Topeka vs Central city
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Topeka and Central city at 1.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 10.9% in Topeka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Topeka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.