Demographics details for Tomball, TX vs Wakita, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tomball, TX vs Wakita, OK.
| Data | Tomball | Wakita |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,585 | 307 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $70,829 | $34,375 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Tomball vs Wakita
- In Tomball, the population is higher at 13,585, compared to 307 in Wakita.
- Residents in Tomball have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 35.5 years in Wakita.
- Tomball has a higher median income of $70,829 compared to $34,375 in Wakita.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tomball at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Wakita.
- The poverty level is higher in Wakita at 15%, compared to 9% in Tomball.
- Wakita has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Tomball.
Demographics
Demographics Tomball vs Wakita provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tomball | Wakita |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 59 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Tomball vs Wakita
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tomball at 6% compared to 0% in Wakita.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wakita at 74% compared to 59% in Tomball.
- Both Tomball and Wakita have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tomball at 25% compared to 20% in Wakita.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tomball at 10% compared to 4% in Wakita.
- In Wakita, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Tomball.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tomball | Wakita |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 15.9% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 34.3% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tomball vs Wakita
- In Wakita, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.8% in Tomball.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wakita at 25.5% versus 22.8% in Tomball.
- Wakita has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 15.9% in Tomball.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tomball at 20.1% compared to 15.8% in Wakita.
- Wakita has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 34.3% in Tomball.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wakita at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Tomball.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tomball | Wakita |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (114) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (1,730) | 25.1% (77) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (1,610) | 10.4% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.1% (2,869) | 11.4% (35) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tomball vs Wakita
- A higher percentage of residents in Tomball have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Wakita.
- In Wakita, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 12.7% in Tomball.
- More residents in Tomball have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 10.4% in Wakita.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tomball hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.1% compared to 11.4% in Wakita.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.