Demographics details for Toccoa, GA vs Swan lake, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Toccoa, GA vs Swan lake, NY.
| Data | Toccoa | Swan lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,146 | 331 |
| Median Age | 42.3 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $49,860 | $55,000 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Toccoa vs Swan lake
- In Toccoa, the population is higher at 9,146, compared to 331 in Swan lake.
- Residents in Toccoa have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 40.0 years in Swan lake.
- Swan lake has a higher median income of $55,000, compared to $49,860 in Toccoa.
- In Swan lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 31.0% in Toccoa.
- Toccoa has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 5% in Swan lake.
- The unemployment rate in Toccoa is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.0% in Swan lake.
Demographics
Demographics Toccoa vs Swan lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Toccoa | Swan lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 5 |
| White | 74 | 80 |
| Asian | 2 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Toccoa vs Swan lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Toccoa at 19% compared to 5% in Swan lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Swan lake at 80% compared to 74% in Toccoa.
- In Swan lake, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 2% in Toccoa.
- Swan lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Toccoa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Toccoa at 4% compared to 0% in Swan lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Toccoa and Swan lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Toccoa | Swan lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Toccoa vs Swan lake
- More residents in Toccoa report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Toccoa at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Toccoa at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Toccoa at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Toccoa at 34.9% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Toccoa at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Toccoa | Swan lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (244) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (2,284) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (1,887) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (1,090) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Toccoa vs Swan lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Toccoa have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Toccoa hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- More residents in Toccoa have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Toccoa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in Swan lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.