Demographics details for Toccoa, GA vs Mendenhall, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Toccoa, GA vs Mendenhall, MS.
| Data | Toccoa | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,146 | 2,148 |
| Median Age | 42.3 years | 39.0 years |
| Median Income | $49,860 | $35,956 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Toccoa vs Mendenhall
- In Toccoa, the population is higher at 9,146, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
- Residents in Toccoa have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 39.0 years in Mendenhall.
- Toccoa has a higher median income of $49,860 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Toccoa and Mendenhall at 31.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 17% in Toccoa.
- Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 4.0% in Toccoa.
Demographics
Demographics Toccoa vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Toccoa | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 65 |
| White | 74 | 34 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Toccoa vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 19% in Toccoa.
- Toccoa has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- The Asian population is larger in Toccoa at 2% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Toccoa at 1% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Toccoa at 4% compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Toccoa and Mendenhall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Toccoa | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 46.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Toccoa vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.3% in Toccoa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mendenhall at 24.8% versus 22.6% in Toccoa.
- Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 19.9% in Toccoa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Toccoa at 15.5% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
- Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 34.9% in Toccoa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 16.0% in Toccoa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Toccoa | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (244) | 0.7% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (2,284) | 17.9% (385) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (1,887) | 20.7% (445) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (1,090) | 18.4% (395) |
Education Levels Comparison: Toccoa vs Mendenhall
- A higher percentage of residents in Toccoa have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.7% in Mendenhall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Toccoa hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mendenhall at 20.7%, compared to 20.6% in Toccoa.
- In Mendenhall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 11.9% in Toccoa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.