Demographics details for Toccoa, GA vs Jefferson, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Toccoa, GA vs Jefferson, WI.
Data | Toccoa | Jefferson |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,146 | 7,649 |
Median Age | 42.3 years | 44.8 years |
Median Income | $49,860 | $69,844 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Toccoa vs Jefferson
- In Toccoa, the population is higher at 9,146, compared to 7,649 in Jefferson.
- The median age in Jefferson is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 42.3 years in Toccoa.
- Jefferson has a higher median income of $69,844, compared to $49,860 in Toccoa.
- In Jefferson, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 31.0% in Toccoa.
- Toccoa has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 5% in Jefferson.
- The unemployment rate in Toccoa is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Jefferson.
Demographics
Demographics Toccoa vs Jefferson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Toccoa | Jefferson |
---|---|---|
Black | 19 | 2 |
White | 74 | 79 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Toccoa vs Jefferson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Toccoa at 19% compared to 2% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jefferson at 79% compared to 74% in Toccoa.
- The Asian population is larger in Toccoa at 2% compared to 0% in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 1% in Toccoa.
- Both Toccoa and Jefferson have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Toccoa and Jefferson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Toccoa | Jefferson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 9.8% |
Depression | 22.6% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 15.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 24.2% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 33.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Toccoa vs Jefferson
- More residents in Toccoa report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.7% in Jefferson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jefferson at 22.9% versus 22.6% in Toccoa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Toccoa at 19.9% compared to 15.3% in Jefferson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jefferson at 24.2% compared to 15.5% in Toccoa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Toccoa at 34.9% compared to 33.7% in Jefferson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Toccoa at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Jefferson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Toccoa | Jefferson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (244) | 2.8% (215) |
High School Diploma | 25.0% (2,284) | 24.4% (1,865) |
Less than High School | 20.6% (1,887) | 13.3% (1,019) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (1,090) | 16.4% (1,254) |
Education Levels Comparison: Toccoa vs Jefferson
- In Jefferson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 2.7% in Toccoa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Toccoa hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 24.4% in Jefferson.
- More residents in Toccoa have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 13.3% in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 11.9% in Toccoa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.