Demographics details for Toccoa, GA vs Forest city, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Toccoa, GA vs Forest city, NC.
| Data | Toccoa | Forest city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,146 | 7,358 |
| Median Age | 42.3 years | 32.8 years |
| Median Income | $49,860 | $35,232 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Toccoa vs Forest city
- In Toccoa, the population is higher at 9,146, compared to 7,358 in Forest city.
- Residents in Toccoa have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 32.8 years in Forest city.
- Toccoa has a higher median income of $49,860 compared to $35,232 in Forest city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Toccoa at 31.0% compared to 21.0% in Forest city.
- Toccoa has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 11% in Forest city.
- Forest city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Toccoa.
Demographics
Demographics Toccoa vs Forest city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Toccoa | Forest city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 28 |
| White | 74 | 57 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Toccoa vs Forest city
- In Forest city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 19% in Toccoa.
- Toccoa has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 57% in Forest city.
- Both Toccoa and Forest city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Forest city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 1% in Toccoa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest city at 5%, compared to 4% in Toccoa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Toccoa and Forest city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Toccoa | Forest city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 41.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Toccoa vs Forest city
- In Forest city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.3% in Toccoa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Forest city at 24.4% versus 22.6% in Toccoa.
- Forest city has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 19.9% in Toccoa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Toccoa at 15.5% compared to 15.2% in Forest city.
- Forest city has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 34.9% in Toccoa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest city at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in Toccoa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Toccoa | Forest city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (244) | 0.9% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (2,284) | 15.5% (1,140) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (1,887) | 13.0% (956) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (1,090) | 10.7% (785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Toccoa vs Forest city
- A higher percentage of residents in Toccoa have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.9% in Forest city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Toccoa hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 15.5% in Forest city.
- More residents in Toccoa have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 13.0% in Forest city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Toccoa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 10.7% in Forest city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.