Demographics details for Tinley park, IL vs Summerfield, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tinley park, IL vs Summerfield, NC.
Data | Tinley park | Summerfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 54,287 | 11,111 |
Median Age | 41.6 years | 45.1 years |
Median Income | $99,628 | $148,182 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Tinley park vs Summerfield
- In Tinley park, the population is higher at 54,287, compared to 11,111 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 41.6 years in Tinley park.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182, compared to $99,628 in Tinley park.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 45.0% in Tinley park.
- The poverty level is higher in Summerfield at 7%, compared to 5% in Tinley park.
- The unemployment rate in Tinley park is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Tinley park vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tinley park | Summerfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 5 |
White | 71 | 82 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tinley park vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tinley park at 6% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 82% compared to 71% in Tinley park.
- Both Tinley park and Summerfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tinley park at 12% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tinley park at 7% compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tinley park and Summerfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tinley park | Summerfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 13.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 8.2% |
Depression | 18.6% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 12.5% | 10.6% |
Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 28.3% | 28.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tinley park vs Summerfield
- More residents in Tinley park report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Summerfield at 22.6% versus 18.6% in Tinley park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tinley park at 12.5% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tinley park at 19.9% compared to 19.5% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has higher obesity rates at 28.7% compared to 28.3% in Tinley park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Summerfield at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Tinley park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tinley park | Summerfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (275) | 1.0% (109) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,199) | 8.8% (973) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (3,208) | 6.1% (674) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.8% (15,085) | 38.9% (4,326) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tinley park vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Tinley park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tinley park hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Summerfield at 6.1%, compared to 5.9% in Tinley park.
- In Summerfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 27.8% in Tinley park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.