Demographics details for Three oaks, MI vs Woodbine, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Three oaks, MI vs Woodbine, NJ.
| Data | Three oaks | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,397 | 2,142 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 46.8 years |
| Median Income | $57,083 | $41,167 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Three oaks vs Woodbine
- The population in Woodbine is higher at 2,142, compared to 1,397 in Three oaks.
- The median age in Woodbine is higher at 46.8 years, compared to 40.4 years in Three oaks.
- Three oaks has a higher median income of $57,083 compared to $41,167 in Woodbine.
- In Woodbine, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 27.0% in Three oaks.
- Three oaks has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Woodbine.
- Woodbine has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.9% in Three oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Three oaks vs Woodbine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Three oaks | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 23 |
| White | 52 | 27 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Three oaks vs Woodbine
- In Woodbine, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 0% in Three oaks.
- Three oaks has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 27% in Woodbine.
- The Asian population is larger in Three oaks at 1% compared to 0% in Woodbine.
- Woodbine has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 26% in Three oaks.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Three oaks at 21% compared to 20% in Woodbine.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Three oaks and Woodbine at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Three oaks | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 17.4% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 27.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 37.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Three oaks vs Woodbine
- In Woodbine, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.0% in Three oaks.
- Depression is more prevalent in Three oaks at 25.3% compared to 24.0% in Woodbine.
- Woodbine has a higher smoking rate at 27.6% compared to 17.8% in Three oaks.
- Binge drinking is more common in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 16.0% in Woodbine.
- Woodbine has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 35.0% in Three oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodbine at 37.0% compared to 11.0% in Three oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Three oaks | Woodbine |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (25) | 13.4% (288) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (226) | 24.9% (534) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (114) | 44.6% (956) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (171) | 5.3% (113) |
Education Levels Comparison: Three oaks vs Woodbine
- In Woodbine, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 13.4% compared to 1.8% in Three oaks.
- In Woodbine, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 16.2% in Three oaks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodbine at 44.6%, compared to 8.2% in Three oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Three oaks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 5.3% in Woodbine.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.