Demographics details for Three oaks, MI vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Three oaks, MI vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Three oaks | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,397 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,083 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Three oaks vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 1,397 in Three oaks.
- Residents in Three oaks have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $57,083 in Three oaks.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 27.0% in Three oaks.
- Three oaks has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 2.9% in Three oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Three oaks vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Three oaks | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 11 |
| White | 52 | 53 |
| Asian | 1 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Three oaks vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Three oaks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tacoma at 53% compared to 52% in Three oaks.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Three oaks.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Three oaks at 26% compared to 12% in Tacoma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Three oaks at 21% compared to 13% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Three oaks.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Three oaks | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Three oaks vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Three oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 25.3% in Three oaks.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Three oaks at 17.8% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Three oaks at 35.0% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Three oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Three oaks | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (25) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (226) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (114) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (171) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Three oaks vs Tacoma
- A higher percentage of residents in Three oaks have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Three oaks hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 8.2% in Three oaks.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 12.2% in Three oaks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.