Demographics details for Three oaks, MI vs Riverside, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Three oaks, MI vs Riverside, CA.
| Data | Three oaks | Riverside |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,397 | 320,764 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,083 | $83,448 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Three oaks vs Riverside
- The population in Riverside is higher at 320,764, compared to 1,397 in Three oaks.
- Residents in Three oaks have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 32.4 years in Riverside.
- Riverside has a higher median income of $83,448, compared to $57,083 in Three oaks.
- In Riverside, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 27.0% in Three oaks.
- The poverty level is identical in both Three oaks and Riverside at 12%.
- Riverside has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 2.9% in Three oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Three oaks vs Riverside provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Three oaks | Riverside |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 52 | 18 |
| Asian | 1 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 55 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Three oaks vs Riverside
- In Riverside, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Three oaks.
- Three oaks has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 18% in Riverside.
- In Riverside, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Three oaks.
- Riverside has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 26% in Three oaks.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Three oaks at 21% compared to 12% in Riverside.
- In Riverside, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Three oaks.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Three oaks | Riverside |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 17.1% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 13.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 36.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Three oaks vs Riverside
- More residents in Three oaks report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Riverside.
- Depression is more prevalent in Three oaks at 25.3% compared to 17.1% in Riverside.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Three oaks at 17.8% compared to 13.2% in Riverside.
- Binge drinking is more common in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 16.1% in Riverside.
- Riverside has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 35.0% in Three oaks.
- Disability percentages are higher in Three oaks at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverside.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Three oaks | Riverside |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (25) | 2.0% (6,286) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (226) | 15.7% (50,271) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (114) | 20.3% (64,976) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (171) | 14.9% (47,929) |
Education Levels Comparison: Three oaks vs Riverside
- In Riverside, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.8% in Three oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Three oaks hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 15.7% in Riverside.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverside at 20.3%, compared to 8.2% in Three oaks.
- In Riverside, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 12.2% in Three oaks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.