Demographics details for Three oaks, MI vs Mcdonough, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Three oaks, MI vs Mcdonough, GA.
| Data | Three oaks | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,397 | 30,340 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $57,083 | $77,804 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Three oaks vs Mcdonough
- The population in Mcdonough is higher at 30,340, compared to 1,397 in Three oaks.
- Residents in Three oaks have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804, compared to $57,083 in Three oaks.
- In Mcdonough, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 27.0% in Three oaks.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcdonough at 13%, compared to 12% in Three oaks.
- Mcdonough has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 2.9% in Three oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Three oaks vs Mcdonough provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Three oaks | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 70 |
| White | 52 | 14 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Three oaks vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 0% in Three oaks.
- Three oaks has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- In Mcdonough, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Three oaks.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Three oaks at 26% compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Three oaks at 21% compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Three oaks and Mcdonough at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Three oaks | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Three oaks vs Mcdonough
- More residents in Three oaks report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.4% in Mcdonough.
- Depression is more prevalent in Three oaks at 25.3% compared to 19.6% in Mcdonough.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Three oaks at 17.8% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
- Binge drinking is more common in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 35.0% in Three oaks.
- Disability percentages are higher in Three oaks at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Three oaks | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (25) | 0.7% (221) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (226) | 14.8% (4,501) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (114) | 4.9% (1,500) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (171) | 16.1% (4,882) |
Education Levels Comparison: Three oaks vs Mcdonough
- A higher percentage of residents in Three oaks have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of residents in Three oaks hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 14.8% in Mcdonough.
- More residents in Three oaks have less than a high school education at 8.2% compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- In Mcdonough, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 12.2% in Three oaks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.