Demographics details for Three oaks, MI vs Coconut creek, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Three oaks, MI vs Coconut creek, FL.
Data | Three oaks | Coconut creek |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,397 | 57,348 |
Median Age | 40.4 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $57,083 | $72,740 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Three oaks vs Coconut creek
- The population in Coconut creek is higher at 57,348, compared to 1,397 in Three oaks.
- The median age in Coconut creek is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 40.4 years in Three oaks.
- Coconut creek has a higher median income of $72,740, compared to $57,083 in Three oaks.
- In Coconut creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 27.0% in Three oaks.
- Three oaks has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Coconut creek.
- Coconut creek has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.9% in Three oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Three oaks vs Coconut creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Three oaks | Coconut creek |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 15 |
White | 52 | 39 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 26 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Three oaks vs Coconut creek
- In Coconut creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Three oaks.
- Three oaks has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 39% in Coconut creek.
- In Coconut creek, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Three oaks.
- Coconut creek has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 26% in Three oaks.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Three oaks at 21% compared to 16% in Coconut creek.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Three oaks and Coconut creek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Three oaks | Coconut creek |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.9% |
Depression | 25.3% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 17.8% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 27.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Three oaks vs Coconut creek
- More residents in Three oaks report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.4% in Coconut creek.
- Depression is more prevalent in Three oaks at 25.3% compared to 17.8% in Coconut creek.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Three oaks at 17.8% compared to 16.2% in Coconut creek.
- Binge drinking is more common in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 15.6% in Coconut creek.
- Obesity rates are higher in Three oaks at 35.0% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Three oaks and Coconut creek at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Three oaks | Coconut creek |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (25) | 1.4% (831) |
High School Diploma | 16.2% (226) | 16.6% (9,506) |
Less than High School | 8.2% (114) | 8.9% (5,111) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (171) | 26.5% (15,196) |
Education Levels Comparison: Three oaks vs Coconut creek
- A higher percentage of residents in Three oaks have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.4% in Coconut creek.
- In Coconut creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 16.2% in Three oaks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coconut creek at 8.9%, compared to 8.2% in Three oaks.
- In Coconut creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 12.2% in Three oaks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.