Demographics details for Three oaks, MI vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Three oaks, MI vs Cambridge, OH.
| Data | Three oaks | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,397 | 9,985 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $57,083 | $39,589 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Three oaks vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 9,985, compared to 1,397 in Three oaks.
- Residents in Three oaks have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Three oaks has a higher median income of $57,083 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 27.0% in Three oaks.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 12% in Three oaks.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.9% in Three oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Three oaks vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Three oaks | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 52 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Three oaks vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Three oaks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to 52% in Three oaks.
- The Asian population is larger in Three oaks at 1% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Three oaks at 26% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Three oaks at 21% compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Three oaks and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Three oaks | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 26.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 46.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Three oaks vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.0% in Three oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 25.3% in Three oaks.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 17.8% in Three oaks.
- Binge drinking is more common in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 35.0% in Three oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Three oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Three oaks | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (25) | 0.7% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (226) | 25.1% (2,502) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (114) | 17.3% (1,732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (171) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Three oaks vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Three oaks have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 16.2% in Three oaks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 8.2% in Three oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Three oaks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.